![]() |
A small
spark can ignite a protest, such as metro ticket increase (AFP Photo/
Johan
ORDONEZ)
|
Paris (AFP) - Angry citizens have swelled the streets of cities across the globe this year, pushing back against a disparate range of policies but often expressing a common grievance -- the establishment's failure to heed their demands for a more equitable future.
While
street protests are nothing new, experts say the intense 2019 flare-ups reflect
a growing sentiment that the social contract between governments and citizens
has broken down, with voters paying the price but unable to affect meaningful
change.
"What
unites the protests is that all are responding to a sense of exclusion,
pessimism about the future, and a feeling of having lost control to
unaccountable elites," said Jake Werner, a historian at the University of
Chicago.
The
financial crisis of 2007-08 in particular, he said, exposed systemic failings
and induced years of austerity and insecurity for millions of people.
It also
produced an acute sense of unfairness, in particular among young people who see
their prospects of earning a decent living slipping away with every price hike
or benefit cut.
"What
was previously experienced as proper or natural is now increasingly experienced
as a form of domination and injustice," Werner told AFP.
![]() |
Parisians
brought the city to a standstill in a demonstration against pension
overhauls
(AFP Photo/Alain JOCARD)
|
As a
result, it often takes only a small move to spark a protest -- in Chile it was
a metro ticket increase, in Iran and France it was higher fuel costs, in
Lebanon a "WhatsApp tax" -- that balloons into a wider revolt
demanding better living standards.
Elsewhere,
as in Hong Kong, Algeria and India, calls for greater political freedom have
become a potent rallying force.
In Iraq,
fury over corruption and unemployment boiled over into fiery clashes which have
left hundreds of people dead and forced the prime minister to resign.
"The
belief in democracy's capacity to change people's lives is undoubtedly
eroding," said Erik Neveu, a sociologist at the Sciences Po political
science university in Rennes, western France.
'Rejection of neo-liberalism'
For Olivier
Fillieule, a specialist in social movements at the University of Lausanne in
Switzerland, this year's protests built on the same dynamics which produced
movements as diverse as Occupy Wall Street, the Arab Spring, or the Russian
opposition to President Vladimir Putin.
"Don't
forget that Time magazine named 'the Protester' its person of the year in
2011," Fillieule said.
![]() |
Algerians
have also been protesting for greater political freedoms (AFP Photo/
RYAD KRAMDI)
|
"The
rejection of neo-liberalism is the main driver of most of these
movements," he said, noting that "the state's abdication of some of
its responsibilities leaves people alone against the market".
The
impression that big companies and the wealthy seem to get a free pass --
despite calls to force multinationals to pay more taxes -- only further
inflames the sense that the game is rigged.
"Society
is fed up with paying and paying. They've squeezed us like a lemon,"
Marcela Paz, a 51-year-old teacher, said during a protest in Santiago, Chile in
October.
And if the
traditional rungs for climbing the social ladder are out of reach, experts say
more people will feel that protests, and potentially violence, are the only
recourse.
In France,
for example, the "yellow vest" anger over high costs of living
quickly spiralled into rioting and clashes with police -- and eventually forced
the government to pledge billions of euros in tax cuts and wage boosts.
Then in
December French unions backed by the "yellow vests" called a
nationwide strike to protest against pension reforms, which brought the country
to a virtual standstill for several weeks.
'Unaccountable'
Experts say
the multitude of long-running protests, some of which have carried on for weeks
or even months at a time, could provide mutual energy while also inspiring new
movements.
"It is
clear that protests and other forms of movement activity have been very much on
the rise in recent years, and perhaps this year in particular," said Doug
McAdam, a sociologist at Stanford University in California.
And
reflecting the distrust of top-down democracy, most movements have rejected
leadership, embracing instead a "horizontal" organisation facilitated
by social media or as in Hong Kong by secure message apps.
In some
countries like Iran and Egypt, authorities have tried to curtain the social
movements by cutting off the internet -- India this month cut mobile access in
parts of Delhi amid protests against a citizenship law deemed anti-Muslim --
but without much success in the long term.
These are
not only "Facebook revolutions", says Geoffrey Pleyers, a sociology
professor in Belgium and France. These are profound movements where young
people often take the lead, but then become intergenerational, he adds.
![]() |
France's
'yellow vest' movement eventually forced the government to pledge
billions of
euros in tax cuts and wage boosts (AFP Photo/Alain JOCARD)
|
The
"horizontal" organisation makes it harder for authorities to single
out someone to negotiate with, or to arrest, in a bid to quell protesters'
anger.
"This
demand of dignity is central in the movement since 2011," Fillieule said.
"The
question of structuring a movement, and how it will be represented, comes
second."
Even if
governments give in to certain demands, they risk facing more protests unless
they address the anger that sent people to the streets in the first place.
"It's
not that the nature of authority changed -- elites are just as unaccountable
today as they were ten years ago," Werner said.
"What
changed is that elite unaccountability has been exposed, because popular forces
are no longer aligned with elites as they once were."





No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.