| The March 15 rampage in Christchurch by a white supremacist gunman has been a shock to the collective system in New Zealand (AFP Photo/William WEST) |
New Zealand will crack down on firearms ownership this week after the Christchurch mosques massacre that claimed 50 lives -- and the Kiwi gun lobby, for the most part, is okay with that.
In stark
contrast to the United States, where even the most minor curbs on gun ownership
meet ferocious opposition led by the National Rifle Association, New Zealand
gun owners agree action is needed.
The March
15 rampage by a white supremacist gunman has been a shock to the collective
system.
"We
want to support our government in any changes to prevent a terrorist attack
from happening in New Zealand again," Nicole McKee, secretary of the
Council of Licensed Firearm Owners said.
Prime
Minister Jacinda Ardern's government announced an immediate ban on
military-style semi-automatic rifles (MSSAs) after the shooting and will put
laws to parliament formalising its action on Tuesday.
Finalising
such legislation can often take months but Ardern says the matter is so urgent
it will be done by April 11.
Further
curbs -- potentially including a gun register, tighter vetting and stricter gun
storage rules -- are set to be passed by the end of the year.
In a move
that would be unthinkable in the United States, one of New Zealand's largest
gun retailers, Hunting & Fishing, voluntarily stopped selling MSSAs and
halted online firearms sales.
"Such
weapons of war have no place in our business -- or our country," chief
executive Darren Jacobs said.
New Zealand has its own National Rifle Association, but since the shooting, it has been at pains to point out it is a small sporting organisation, not a wealthy political lobby group like its American counterpart.
![]() |
Graphic
showing gun ownership rates in selected countries,
plus gun statistics for New
Zealand. (AFP Photo/John SAEKI)
|
New Zealand has its own National Rifle Association, but since the shooting, it has been at pains to point out it is a small sporting organisation, not a wealthy political lobby group like its American counterpart.
"Our
members shoot with single-shot bolt action rifles at paper targets,"
president Malcolm Dodson said.
Another
office holder has told media the New Zealand NRA is considering changing its
name to avoid any association with the American body.
On the
surface, New Zealand and the United States share many historical similarities,
but they have a fundamentally different attitude towards firearms.
Both are
former British colonies that fought bitter wars against indigenous populations
and forged an individualistic frontier mentality.
However,
statistics highlight the difference.
In 2016,
New Zealand, with a population of about 4.7 million, had nine firearms-related
homicides.
In the
United States, population approximately 327 million, there were 14,415, about
23 times the per capita rate as New Zealand.
A
privilege or a right?
There are
approximately 393 million guns in private hands in the United States, or 1.2
for every person, whereas New Zealand has about 1.5 million, or 0.3 per person.
The New
Zealand government believes there are 13,500 MSSAs in the country, while
estimates put the number in the US at 15 million.
Philip Alperts, a gun policy researcher at the University of Sydney, said the crucial difference between New Zealand and the United States was the US Constitution's Second Amendment, which guarantees the right to keep and bear arms.
![]() |
In 2016,
New Zealand, with a population of about 4.7 million, had nine
firearms-related
homicides (AFP Photo/Anthony WALLACE)
|
Philip Alperts, a gun policy researcher at the University of Sydney, said the crucial difference between New Zealand and the United States was the US Constitution's Second Amendment, which guarantees the right to keep and bear arms.
Alperts,
himself a Kiwi, said countries such as New Zealand viewed gun ownership as a
privilege, while in America it was seen as an inalienable right.
"We
have a population who, when they travelled to America would get off the plane and
be absolutely horrified to see people walking around with a gun," he said,
adding that safety was at the centre of New Zealand gun culture.
Journalist
Dawn Picken covered scores of shooting deaths in the United States and once had
bullets lodged in her bedroom when a random gunman opened fire on her apartment
building in Spokane, Washington state.
She said
she had found a different mindset since moving to New Zealand in 2011.
"It
was quite refreshing as an American to come here and hear Kiwis who own guns
say 'I don't think they should be easy to get and it's not my right, they
should check I'm not predisposed to violence or going to go off the
rails," she said.
'Semi-automatic trifles'
![]() |
The March
15 rampage in Christchurch by a white supremacist
gunman has been a shock to
the collective system in
New Zealand (AFP Photo/William WEST)
|
'Semi-automatic trifles'
However,
like anywhere, New Zealand has a vocal fringe element.
"Tyrant
Prime Minister Kills Sports Shooting," screams the headline on one
prominent pro-gun website.
But former
police minister Judith Collins had a blunt message for the US NRA and any other
gun lobbyists who tried to inject themselves into New Zealand's gun control
debate: "Bugger off."
The
difference in gun cultures has played out on social media since the
Christchurch shooting.
When a
right-wing US website tweeted that "armed government thugs" were
carrying out door-to-door gun confiscations in New Zealand, dozens of Kiwis
left mocking replies.
"I had
a self-saucing dessert in my pantry," said one. "The cops came for it
in the dead of night -- apparently we aren't allowed semi-automatic
trifles."



No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.