![]() |
| Some American parents will pay heavily to better their children's chances of entering schools like Washington's Georgetown University (AFP Photo/WIN MCNAMEE) |
New York (AFP) - The scandal of parents paying to cheat their children's way into elite US universities has put a harsh spotlight on the ultra-competitive college admissions process, in which the haves hold a massive advantage over the have-nots.
Thirty-three
wealthy parents -- financiers, lawyers, and two famous actresses among them --
were arrested Tuesday as part of an operation that charged from $15,000 to
millions of dollars to help them get their children into renowned schools like
Yale, Georgetown, Stanford and the University of Southern California.
But as
outraged as many Americans were at the illegality, even within the law, the
rich have a huge, unfair advantage when it comes to gaming the intensely
stressful annual college admissions battle.
The
competition is clear in the numbers. Just 4.6 percent of over 40,000 students
applying to Harvard University get in.
The figure
is 4.3 percent at Stanford and 5.5 percent and Columbia, two other top
universities.
Many who
are qualified grade-wise are rejected, intensifying the competition to stand
out.
The process
favors the wealthy. They can apply to more schools and invest heavily in
preparing for tests and essays.
The
richest, too, can beat the competition by donating to universities. ProPublica editor
Daniel Golden documented how President Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner gained
admission to Harvard University in 1998 after his father made a legal $2.5
million donation to the school.
"There's
a limited number of spots for those with enormous means," said Hafeez
Lakhani, whose Lakhani Coaching company helps prepare students.
"I
understand that there is a disparity out there and that not everyone is able to
afford the best help or any help at all."
Planning
and spending
Many
parents spend their kids' lives planning their university career.
"In
the United States, families are obsessed with the entrance into
university," said Sylvie Bigar, a New Yorker whose daughter just entered
the respected Smith College in Massachusetts.
![]() |
Some
American parents will pay heavily to better their children's chances of
entering
schools like Washington's Georgetown University (AFP Photo/WIN
MCNAMEE)
|
"It
seems like these things are decided almost in kindergarten, that admission to a
prestigious university leads to a prestigious career and happiness."
"It's
an extremely stressful process, especially for kids whose parents aren't the
most affluent," said Angela Perez, a student at the highly competitive
Georgetown University in Washington.
"While
I considered myself academically strong, getting in was one thing, and paying
for it was another."
Perez, from
a working class, immigrant Filipino family, said that to maximize her chances
at both acceptance and financial aid, she applied to 18 different universities.
Adding
together the application fees, test fees, training for the tests, and other,
she said, "it was honestly quite costly."
$40,000
to prepare
The process
begins in earnest in tenth grade, three years before graduating from high
school. Students prepare for and take multiple times the ACT and SAT entrance
examinations -- the ones the parents arrested Tuesday paid to have fixed for
their children.
There are
essays to write, interviews, tutorials, preparation tests, and for the families
with access and connections, direct lobbying.
And, notes
Bigar, "at every stage of this process, there are firms that help families
who can afford it."
According to
the Independent Educational Consultants Association, parents pay on average
$200 an hour to consult experts on the applications process. But that price, in
some situations, can run into the thousands of dollars per hour.
The parents
of children who are shepherded by Lakhani pay on average $40,000.
"The
reason families are interested in working with my firm is that they see an
opportunity to climb higher than they would have climbed potentially on their
own," he said.
To critics
of the system, the issue illustrates the deep economic and social inequality in
the country.
"It's
obviously a scandal when rich people are accused of breaking the law to get
their kids into top schools," wrote journalist Rainesford Stauffer in an
op-ed in the New York Times.
"But
the bigger outrage should be that a legal version of purchasing an advantage
happens every college application season and that there's an entire industry
supporting it."
Related Article:
Related Article:



No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.