![]() |
| President Donald Trump, seen here taking questions from reporters outside the White House, has met with the publisher of the New York Times (AFP Photo/Alex EDELMAN) |
Washington
(AFP) - The publisher of the New York Times has warned Donald Trump in a White
House meeting that the president's escalating attacks on the news media are
"inflammatory" and "dangerous and harmful to our country."
Trump's
meeting with A.G. Sulzberger, who took the reins of the prestigious newspaper
on Jan. 1, took place July 20, following a request from the White House for
what appeared to be a routine get-to-know-you session.
The
session, which also included Times editorial page editor James Bennet, had
remained secret under mutual agreement until Trump tweeted about it early
Sunday.
"Had a
very good and interesting meeting at the White House with A.G. Sulzberger,
Publisher of the New York Times," Trump said on Twitter.
"Spent
much time talking about the vast amounts of Fake News being put out by the
media & how that Fake News has morphed into phrase, 'Enemy of the People.'
Sad!"
Sulzberger,
in a statement released by the Times, said the president's tweet effectively
"put the meeting on the record," and he described what appeared to be
an unusually tough and blunt session with the president.
"I
told the president directly that I thought that his language was not just
divisive but increasingly dangerous," Sulzberger said.
"I
told him that although the phrase 'fake news' is untrue and harmful, I am far
more concerned about his labeling journalists 'the enemy of the people.' I
warned that this inflammatory language is contributing to a rise in threats
against journalists and will lead to violence."
With some
foreign leaders using Trump's language "to justify sweeping crackdowns on
journalists, I warned that it was putting lives at risk."
Sulzberger
concluded: "I implored him to reconsider his broader attacks on
journalism, which I believe are dangerous and harmful to our country."
But the
exchange comes at a time of high tension between Trump and the US news media,
with Trump regularly denouncing critical news reports as "fake news."
The
37-year-old Sulzberger is the latest in a long line of Sulzbergers to lead the
Times. When he took over leadership of the "Gray Lady" after several
years as a reporter or editor, Trump tweeted that the young man's rise gave the
paper a "last chance" to prove itself impartial and to report the
news "without fear or FAVOR."
But since
then, as the Times and other news sources have chronicled Trump's personal and
political problems and logged his frequent misstatements, the president has
repeatedly lashed back.
He has
tweeted scores of times that the Times is "very dishonest,"
"failing and corrupt," and that it uses "phony and nonexistent
sources."
![]() |
Reporter
Kaitlan Collins asking a question at the White House, which barred her from
a
different event at a time of high tensions between the press and President
Donald
Trump (AFP Photo/MANDEL NGAN)
|
The Times
has defended its reporters' work and pointed out that, far from
"failing," it has enjoyed healthy growth. Last year's revenue hit
$1.7 billion, 8 percent above the previous year.
Love/hate
relationship
Observers
say the president has a love/hate relationship with what was his hometown
newspaper as he grew up in New York and became one of the city's best-known
figures, craving space in its columns but furious when it appeared critical of
him.
Whether the
Trump-Sulzberger meeting will lead to any easing of White House tensions with
the press remained unclear, though Trump's tweet did not seem to suggest so.
As one
former Times editor said Sunday on social media about the chances of any
reconciliation, "Don't hold your breath."
If
anything, Trump's relations with the press seem recently to have hit a new low.
The White
House on Wednesday barred CNN reporter Kaitlan Collins from a press event after
her persistent questioning at an earlier event was deemed "inappropriate."
Olivier
Knox, president of the White House Correspondents Association, deplored the
action as a "wrong-headed and weak" response to a reporter who, he
said, was simply doing her job.



No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.