Appearing
at a Senate Banking Committee hearing Thursday, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)
grilled officials from the Treasury Department over why criminal charges were
not filed against officials at HSBC who helped launder hundreds of millions of dollars for drug cartels.
The HSBC
scandal resulted in the Department of Justice and Treasury announcing a record $1.92 billion fine after finding that the international bank repeatedly helped
the world’s most violent drug gangs move at least $881 million in ill-gotten
gains through numerous countries the U.S. has economic sanctions against.
“HSBC paid
a fine, but no one individual went to trial, no individual was banned from
banking, and there was no hearing to consider shutting down HSBC’s activities
here in the United States,” Warren said. “So, what I’d like is, you’re the
experts on money laundering. I’d like an opinion: What does it take — how many
billions do you have to launder for drug lords and how many economic sanctions
do you have to violate — before someone will consider shutting down a financial
institution like this?”
Treasury Under
Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence David S. Cohen, though
admitting HSBC’s actions were “egregious,” did not answer Warren’s question.
“For our part, we imposed on HSBC the largest penalties that we’ve ever imposed
on any financial institution ever. We looked at the facts and determined that
the most appropriate response there was a very, very significant penalty
against the institution.”
Warren
reiterated her question and still got nowhere. “We at the Treasury Department…
don’t have the authority to shut down a financial institution,” Cohen said.
“I
understand that,” Warren said, visibly annoyed. “I’m asking, in your opinion —
you’re the ones who are supposed to be the experts on money laundering, you
work with everyone else including the Department of Justice — in your opinion,
how many billions of dollars do you have to launder for drug lords before
somebody says, ‘We’re shutting you down,’?”
Cohen
continued to rebuff her question, saying that Treasury vigorously prosecutes
and fines offending banks but still insisting: “I’m not going to get into some
hypothetical line-drawing exercise.”
Frustrated,
Warren turned to Federal Reserve board member Jerome H. Powell, who said that
such a proceeding would take place after a criminal conviction. ‘That’s not
something — we don’t do criminal investigation,” he added. “We don’t do trials
or anything like that. We do civil enforcement, and in the case of HSBC we gave
essentially the statutory maximum.”
Warren
seemed stunned: “You have no advice to the Justice Department on whether or not
this was an appropriate case for a criminal action?” But Powell deflected,
saying that’s the Justice Department’s realm and that the Fed will “collaborate
with them” mainly by answering questions, not by recommending prosecutions.
“You know,
if you’re caught with an ounce of cocaine, the chances are good you’re going to
go to jail,” Warren said. “If it happens repeatedly, you may go to jail for the
rest of your life. But evidently, if you launder nearly a billion dollars for
drug cartels and violate our international sanctions, your company pays a fine
and you go home and sleep in your own bed at night, every single individual
associated with this. I think that’s fundamentally wrong.”
This video
is from Elizabeth Warren’s YouTube channel, published March 7, 2013.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.