![]() |
| Reuters/Kevin Lamarque |
Members of
Congress are demanding that U.S. presidential candidate Mitt Romney give full
disclosure of all of his tax returns, but most are refusing to publicize their
own.
The
presumptive presidential nominee has disclosed his 2010 tax return and 2011 tax
return estimate, but refuses to publicize any more. His refusal is generating
critical responses from Congressional members, who claim his secrecy makes him
unfit to run for president.
However
most members of Congress do not think that this same level of transparency
should apply to them. While senators and representatives are required to
publicize their sources of income, they are not required to disclose their tax
returns, which contain additional financial data like spousal income.
McClatchy
has asked all 535 members of Congress for full disclosure of their tax returns,
but only 17 have complied.
Among those
who refused are Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Harry Reid – both of which have
heavily criticized Romney for his limited transparency.
“He could
not even become a Cabinet member for that lack of disclosure, and now with the
lack of disclosure, he wants to be president of the United States,” Rep. Nancy
Pelosi (D-CA) said.
Reid said
Romney’s refusal to publicize more of his financial information makes him unfit
to be a “dogcatcher” – a metaphor for the lowest possible elected office.
But
Pelosi’s aides refused to disclose the representative’s own tax returns, saying
she has already disclosed all that Congress requires.
“The leader
has filed a complete financial disclosure report as required by law that
includes financial holdings, transactions and other personal information,” a
Pelosi spokesman told McClatchy.“There has been no question about where Leader
Pelosi and Democrats stand on tax policy.”
But
similarly, there is no lawful requirement for presidential candidates to
publicly release their tax returns, and it remains a matter of choice for the
contenders.
Romney
claims that full disclosure of his finances would distract from the issues he
finds important.
“In the
political environment that exists today, the opposition research of the Obama
campaign is looking for anything they can use to distract from the failure of
the president to reignite our economy,” Romney told the National Review
Online. “I’m simply not enthusiastic about giving them hundreds or thousands of
more pages to pick through, distort and lie about.”
While some
members of Congress find Romney's full disclosure necessary to better
understand his financial background, they don't consider themselves responsible
for the same.
Tax return
documents indicate spousal incomes, and several members of Congress have
married rich. Among the top of the list are Rep. Michael McCaul, Sen. John
Kerry and Pelosi’s husband, who heads a venture capital and real estate firm.
The representative’s spousal income thus remains publicly unknown.
Most
lawmakers who did share their tax returns with McClatchy received significant
deductions for interest on personal and investment real estate – information
that taxpayers may be interested in, since the tax code is expected to change
in the next few years.
Reporters
are also interested in Congressional members’ tax returns to see how changes in
tax laws would affect their income tax rates and capital gains taxes, dividends
and deductions.
But most
lawmakers refused full disclosure of their own tax returns, while continuing to
demand that Romney release his.
Although
most members of Congress refused to publicize their own tax returns, the DISCLOSE
Act is bringing the transparency debate into the spotlight. On Tuesday, Senate
Republicans blocked the Democratic legislation, which would require certain
tax-exempt groups to disclose the names of some of their highest donors.
While
Congress is battling over greater transparency in presidential campaigns,
hypocrisy has found its way into the government, with most members opposed to
having the same rules apply to them.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.