President
Barack Obama said oil company profits justify abolishing $4 billion in annual
oil and natural gas subsidies and shifting those savings to research on
clean-energy fuels.
![]() |
President
Barack Obama speaks about
rising gas prices and oil company tax
breaks in the
Rose Garden at the White
House on March 29, 2012. Photographer:
Mark
Wilson/Getty Images
|
“It’s not
like these are companies that can’t stand on their own,” Obama said in prepared
remarks delivered in the White House Rose Garden. Last year, the three biggest
U.S. oil companies took home more than $80 billion in profit, with Exxon Mobil
Corp. collecting almost $4.7 million each hour, he said.
“And when
the price of oil goes up, prices at the pump go up, and so do these companies’
profits,” he said. “Meanwhile, these companies pay a lower tax rate than most
other companies on their investments -- partly because we’re giving them
billions in tax giveaways every year.”
Energy
company subsidies are a staple of Obama’s re- election campaign rhetoric, meant
to highlight the differences between himself and Republican presidential
candidates and cast them as defenders of such spending as they propose cuts in
health and other social programs to reduce a deficit forecast at $1.3 trillion
this year.
In his Feb.
13 budget, Obama said existing tax “loopholes and expenditures” for the oil and
natural gas companies amount to an unwarranted “preference” of these industries
over others.
Criticism
of Republicans
At Ohio
State University March 22, Obama ridiculed Republican presidential candidates
as the “flat Earth crowd,” who’d “rather give $4 billion in taxpayer subsidies
to oil companies this year than to invest in clean energy.”
“We have
been subsidizing oil companies for a century. That’s long enough,” he said.
Republicans
today cited a March 3 Congressional Research Service report that found
repealing $22.8 billion in tax breaks over five years would reduce the tax
breaks for independent companies and, on a small scale, “would make oil and
natural gas more expensive for U.S. consumers and likely increase foreign
dependence.”
Senate
Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, in an e-mailed statement, said
Obama’s proposal is a political gambit in an election year and called the plan
a “tax hike on American energy manufacturers” that he’d oppose.
Brendan Buck, a spokesman for House Republican Speaker John Boehner, said today in an
e-mail that the president is giving a speech “with gas prices at $3.92 per
gallon, calling for policy that would make gas more expensive and increase
foreign dependence on oil. You wouldn’t believe it, right? Yet this is
happening.”
Ending such
breaks would reduce the deficit by $41 billion over a decade, according to
Obama’s budget for fiscal 2013.
Subsidies
were worth $24 billion for the five largest oil companies operating in the
U.S., including Irving, Texas’s Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) and Chevron Corp. in
San Ramon, California, Senate Democrats said.
To contact
the reporter on this story: Roger Runningen in Washington at
rrunningen@bloomberg.net
To contact
the editor responsible for this story: Steven Komarow at
skomarow1@bloomberg.net

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.