guardian.co.uk,
Peter Walker, Monday 31 October 2011
![]() |
| Occupy London protesters outside St Paul's Cathedral in London. The movement wants to bring the spotlight back on the bankers. Photograph: Kerim Okten/EPA |
Less than
an hour after the news that the Occupy London protest had, even indirectly, led
to a second senior departure inside St Paul's Cathedral, and the activists were
getting back to the matter in hand: targeting bankers, not clerics.
In another
of the near-daily events at the camp intended as much for photographers and
television crews as passers-by, a dozen or so protesters wearing tattered suits
and white zombie makeup performed a clunkily choreographed mass dance routine
to the tinny sound of Michael Jackson's Thriller, waving a huge, black banner
saying: "Dancing on the grave of capitalism."
It is one
of the many curiosities of a camp officially called Occupy the London Stock
Exchange that it has ended up spending almost as much time debating leadership
issues at the rarefied heights of the Church of England as it has its intended
target, the injustices and inequalities of global finance and banking.
The
activists hope that this will soon change. While the camp shares the general
aims of many counterpart protests around the world, most famously on Wall
Street in New York, by being based in the heart of the capital's financial
district campaigners aim to focus also on the particular mysteries of the City,
and the sometimes anomalous, anachronistic body which runs it, the Corporation
of London.
An initial
list of demands from the camp agreed last week focused heavily on reform within
the City and the corporation.
"Every
country has its own particular national focus. Here, it's clearly
unaccountability, a lack of transparency, and that means the City," said
Naomi Colvin, an Occupy campaigner who has spoken regularly to the press.
This is all
the more the case given that the corporation is leading moves to evict the
camp, serving formal legal notices on Monday that they should pack up their
tents within 48 hours.
"We
say bring it on," said Colvin. "We believe the Corporation of London
is ripe for examination, and we hope to do just that."
As news
emerged that the dean of St Paul's, the Right Rev Graeme Knowles, had stepped down, other activists said they were concerned the debate was becoming
sidetracked.
"I am
saddened we've got a situation where members of the church are resigning,"
said Joel Benjamin, 29. "It's not their responsibility – it's about the
financial system, it's not about the Church of England."
The paradox
is, of course, that however seemingly diversionary, the focus on church matters
has ended up being a PR coup for the camp in some ways. While a smaller,
spillover outpost in Finsbury Square, further east in the City, has been
largely ignored in recent days, the seemingly never-ending dithering of
cathedral officials – especially the much-criticised decision to close St
Paul's for a week on never-fully-explained health and safety grounds – has kept
the main camp continually in the news.
The
decision to pitch 200 or so tents on a small triangle of paving slabs in the
western shadow of the cathedral was apparently accidental. The camp, as befits
its name, had initially targeted Paternoster Square, a modern business and
retail development which contains the London Stock Exchange. As protesters
gathered 17 days ago the privately-owned square was sealed off by police,
funnelling them instead towards the adjoining cathedral.
But
speaking privately, some camp members say the site had been informally
discussed as a possible end point for two reasons. Firstly, its joint ownership
by St Paul's and the Corporation of London promised a legal minefield for
eviction court cases. Additionally, the cathedral draws big crowds of visitors.
Whatever
the intention, the location of the camp has drawn the Church of England into
the debate, ever since the now-departed canon chancellor of St Paul's, the RevGiles Fraser, asked police to leave the steps rather than remove the
protesters.
"We
appreciated what Fraser did – he protected us," said Colvin. "We are
living in the church's shadow and we want good relations, even though sometimes
their attitude can seem slightly patronising.
"But
one thing is certain – before I came here I never thought I'd be having so many
conversations with bishops."

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.